[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Libvir] Flags for CPU / system 'features'



On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:14:57PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 15:03 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Thus I propose a top level '<features>' block within the '<domain>' XML doc.
> > This block would contain tags named after each feature to be enabled. Presence
> > of the named tag enables the feature, ommision disables it (thus all features
> > are disabled by default - matching current behaviour).
> 
> Sounds good to me.  As well as useful to have :)
> 
> > My only thought, is 'features' a good name for this ? Only other name I
> > came up with was 'capabilities' but this is harder to spell :-)
> 
> I think feature is actually pretty reasonable

Ok, I've committed the patch along with updates to the HTML docs on the
XML format. BTW, I think it would be useful to have a formal schema defined
for the XML format - not for sake of validation - just to unambiguously
define what we're expecting in the XML from apps. The current format.html
doc is a good overview, but its not exactly precise in detailing what we
expect / support.

Regards,
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]