[Libvir] [PATCH] Test libvirtd's config-processing code.

[Jim Meyering]

Jim Meyering <jim at meyering.net> wrote:
> Until now, there has been no coverage of libvirtd's config-processing code.
> In adding this, (and esp. in comparing actual/expected diagnostics),
> I noticed and fixed a trivial inconsistency: for a parameter expecting
> a string value, an invalid values, you'd get a different diagnostic for

That should say "given an invalid value, you'd get..."

> the four config parameters that are parsed via remoteConfigGetAuth than
> for all of the other config parameters (which go through checkType).
> This fixes that, too: