[Libvir] Re: Next features and target for development

[Anthony Liguori]

Dan Smith wrote:
> AL> It completely ignores issues like authentication and
> AL> authorization.
>
> Excellent point.  For that reason, a libvirt connection to the remote
> makes sense to me.
>
> AL> virDomainSend(dom, "url://....");
>
> Don't you not want a connection to the remote machine here?
>   

Sure.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>   virDomainSend(dom, rconn, "url://...");
>
> AL> Such an interface could easily support checkpointing, save,
> AL> resume, etc.
>
> AL> If you wanted to introduce a higher level interface for Migrate and
> AL> Checkpoint, that would be fine too provided it just used these lower
> AL> level functions and constructed appropriate URIs.
>
> I'm quite happy with that... :)
>
>