John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:23:19AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:45:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:Daniel P. Berrange wrote:It would still be useful to have a chart describing what APIs are implementedby which driver though & any restrictions the impl may have.I'll have a go at this.Yes that would be useful thanks ! But I'm afraid it may be painful to maintain too, as the various case may increase and the state of the drivers/hypervisors will evolve.This is why library documentation should *always* mention what version an API became supported/was added in. It's utterly miserable trying to use an evolving library otherwise :)
Point taken - I will try to add version numbers reflecting when operations became supported.
Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature