[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [RFC 5/5]: Rewrite findLuns function

Chris Lalancette schreef:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot be a real entry? This assumption is wrong.
Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there is
code below that that is.  However, the code here is generally looking for block
devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device.  Given that, I'm not
sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?
The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device.

OK, cool, I misunderstood.  Given that, can you give me the output of:

# ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0

Just to make sure I get the right thing?

skinkie xen01 ~ $ ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 26 11:28 /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0 -> ../../../devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0

skinkie xen01 ~ $ ls /sys/devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0 block:sdar device_blocked generic iodone_cnt iorequest_cnt queue_depth rescan scsi_level subsystem type vendor delete driver iocounterbits ioerr_cnt model queue_type rev state timeout uevent

skinkie xen01 ~ $ cat /sys/devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0/model


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]