[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] remote_protocol.{c,h} ?



On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:40:13PM +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones redhat com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:00:52PM +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> >> Is it really true that qemud/remote_protocol.{c,h} are created by
> >> rpcgen? If so, why dont we have them created at compile time? I still
> >> see them in the source code.
> >
> > The reason is that only Linux glibc rpcgen can generate them
> > correctly.  rpcgen on other systems usually lacks some feature or
> > other, commonly 64 bit types.
> >
> >> I modified remote_protocol.x a bit, and when recompiling,
> >> remote_protocol.{c,h} are not reflected at all. So it is expected that
> >> developers must recompile with rpcgen themself??
> >
> > No, that should rebuild.  Make sure you're using the CVS version
> > of libvirt though.
> 
> I patched version 0.4.4 and it doesnt automatically rebuild
> remote_protocol.c for me. So it is fixed in CVS already? Great!

Jim Meyering fixed this.  I'm not sure if that was before or after
0.4.4 was released, but CVS seems to be OK for me.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/
Fedora now supports 67 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]