[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] Mac Port of Libvirt





On 9/8/08 12:17 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard redhat com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:43:41AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
>> Thanks Daniel,
>> 
>>>   Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more
>>> complex issue but probably not much  more complex than existing linux
>>> hypervisor support.
>> Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
> 
>   Because that's code which would have to be designed/ported, instead of
> just recompiling completely generic code which has already been ported
> to Windows.
> 
>> By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd
>> running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)?
> 
>   You should not assume this is possible.

Just curious, why there is an option "--without-libvirtd" in configure?
(Which actually works and make will not produce libvirtd.exe)


Many many thanks for your help!

-Yushu

> 
> Daniel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]