[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Fix segfault if no qemu emulator passed



Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>>> There is unfortunately a pretty prevalent
>>>> segfault in the latest libvirt. If a qemu
>>>> domain is defined without an emulator
>>>> specified, libvirtd crashes.
>>>>
>>>> This is doubly unfortunate since current
>>>> virtinst generates an emulator-less config
>>>> for all qemu and kvm guests (I'm about to fix
>>>> this upstream though).
>>> #%(*&#@(%   Damn. This is worthy of a brown paper bag release for libvirt
>>> to fix this shockingly bad bug.
>>>
>> If we are going to do this I'd really like to get the
>> 2 pending max vcpu patches committed, since it's a
>> big issue that we largely disallow smp kvm guests
>> at this moment.
> 
>   Do you need more reviews ? I didn't realized we had pending unapplied
> patches ... Repost if necessary, thanks !
> 
> Daniel
> 

My maxvcpu patch is dependent on Guido's patch which hasn't been
committed yet but has received enough ACKs

Thanks,
Cole


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]