[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] consistency: push "update" hook vs. "make syntax-check"



On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > So using 'tail' instead of this perl script would be more readable
> > and efficient.
> 
> tail -c2 might be my choice, too, for a small number of files.
> But in our case, using it would incur the cost of 1000+ fork+execs.

I was thinking you'd just give it lots of files at once via xargs,
though then you have the tedium of parsing its output

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]