[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] stat() vs. access()



On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:52:35AM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> While discussing some code with Matthias, we stumbled across many occurances
> of stat() calls within the libVirt code (virFileExists() for example) which
> could be implemented in a cheaper way when using access() instead of stat(),
> when the only purpose is to check for the existance of a file.
> 
> The one thing I'm concerned about, is the question if access() does the right
> thing in all situations. As the manpages didn't tell anything about
> directories it might be worth to clarify this in advance.
> 
> A simple practical test showed that
>   access ("/path/to/dir", F_OK)
> seems to work as expected.
> 
> Any comments on these (optimization) thoughs?

I don't see any problems with this idea, so if you want to do the conversion
go for it.

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]