[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] migration: qemu vs. qemu+tcp at virsh vs. libvirt-java



On 11/18/2009 09:28 AM, Thomas Treutner wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 14:05:03 Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> thanks.. I am in the code right now.. what would have been better in the
>> javadoc for you? I will put it in.
> 
> ...
> "If uri is NULL, then libvirt will try to find the best method. Uri may
> specify the hostname or IP address of the destination host as seen from
> the source, or uri may be a URI giving transport, hostname, user, port,
> etc. in the usual form. Uri should only be specified if you want to migrate 
> over a specific interface on the remote host. For Qemu/KVM, the uri should be 
> of the form "tcp://hostname[:port]". This does not require TCP auth to be 
> setup between the connections, since migrate uses a straight TCP connection 
> (unless using the PEER2PEER flag, in which case URI should be a full fledged 
> libvirt URI). Refer also to driver documentation for the particular
> URIs supported."
> ...
> 
> @Cole: I've merged your comment - could you please (N)ACK that? I assume 
> the "tcp://.." form is a special case for Qemu/KVM, as with Xen, an IP was 
> enough.
> 

Sounds good to me.

- Cole


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]