[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] Back and suggested release schedule



On 23/12/2010, at 12:11 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:31:14PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 22/12/2010, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>> Also on the release name, should we go 0.9.0 considering the refactorings
>>> (i.e. indicating future patches will be harder to apply to earlier branches)
>>> or stick to 0.8.7 (considering that there isn't major feature improvement
>>> ... unless I missed them !),
>> 
>> My initial thinking is 0.8.7, but I don't feel strongly about it. :)
>> 
>> With the "freeze", what's a good process to put in place while frozen to
>> make sure only bugs and doc improvements go in?
> 
>  Well that should be part of the review process and people who have commit
> rights are supposed to know the rules ;-)

Heh, sure.  Is that approach really working in reality though (recently anyway)?  :)

I'm thinking... not so much.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]