[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Make domain save work on root-squash NFS

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:09:52PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> FYI, I just verified that the restore failures I was seeing after 
> applying this patch were actually happening *without* the patch as well, 
> and are unrelated to domain save (it's a race condition in domain 
> restore that needs to be dealt with separately), so this patch is okay 
> to put in
> I verified I've been testing with an unmodified form of this patch, 
> *EXCEPT* that I hadn't done make syntax-check on it (since I didn't 
> really think that it was working code at the time ;-)), and there is one 
> occurence of white-space at the end of a line.
> Should I resend with that change? Or do you want to just fix it up?

No, that's fine.

> Also, notice that this patch saves the domain file with 0660 permission 
> (umask will normally turn it into 0640) as we had thought that would be 
> part of the way to allow restore from a root-squashed NFS server (just 
> make sure that the reader had group read permissions). Now it seems we 
> will be using the trick of running the restore code setuid instead, so 
> the 0660 mode will no longer necessary. Should I revise this patch to 
> create the file as 0600, or just do that as part of the upcoming domain 
> restore patch?

0660 will be OK, since we setgid() too.

|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]