[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Re: Supporting hypervisor specific APIs in libvirt



On 03/24/2010 05:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:

The filtering access part of this daemon is also not mapping well onto
libvirt's access model, because we don't soley filter based on UID in
libvirtd. We have it configurable based on UID, policykit, SASL, TLS/x509
already, and intend adding role based access control to further filter
things, integrating with the existing apparmour/selinux security models.
A qemud that filters based on UID only, gives users a side-channel to get
around libvirt's access control.

That's true. Any time you write a multiplexer these issues crop up. Much better to stay in single process land where everything is already taken care of.

What does a multiplexer give you that making individual qemu instances discoverable doesn't give you? The later doesn't suffer from these problems.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

So, at best qemud is a toy for people who are annoyed by libvirt.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]