[libvirt] [C# bindings][PATCH] Add/Clean comments and virConnecSetErrorFunc Sample

Matthias Bolte matthias.bolte at googlemail.com
Mon Nov 1 20:07:10 UTC 2010


Your patches in general are okay, no problem with that. :)

It's just that this patch contains 3 independent changes. As a general
rule of thumb you should do one thing per commit. This makes things
simpler to review and track.

Also the "Correct virDomainInfo marshaling" part could be explained in
a bit more details in the commit message. Like try to answer the
question: What was wrong with it and how did you fix it?

Matthias

2010/11/1  <arnaud.champion at devatom.fr>:
> Okay,
>
> anyway, I think my patches are not well formatted and/or sometime
> "inconsistent" I don't know the well word.
>
> Can you explain me what is a "good" patch, just for make less work for you ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Arnaud
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Matthias Bolte" <matthias.bolte at googlemail.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 7:15 PM
> To: <arnaud.champion at devatom.fr>
> Cc: <libvir-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [C# bindings][PATCH] Add/Clean comments and
> virConnecSetErrorFunc Sample
>
>> 2010/10/30  <arnaud.champion at devatom.fr>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> here is a new patch, it add/correct some comments. It also make
>>> virDomainInfo marshaling working. It also add a new sample
>>> virConnectSetErrorFunc to show usage of virConnectSetErrorFunc, virError
>>> struct, virDomainInfo struct.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Arnaud
>>>
>>
>> Actually this patch contains 3 independent things:
>>
>> - Add / cleaning comments
>> - New sample virConnectSetErrorFunc
>> - Correct virDomainInfo marshaling
>>
>> Therefore, I'd like to see this split up into 3 separate patches.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>
>




More information about the libvir-list mailing list