[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes



?I just found "Error" too large for the person who will use C# bindings :S but... I can use Error, technically no problem.

PS : I don't know exactly the english word, by too large I just want to avoid confusion

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:21 PM
To: <arnaud champion devatom fr>
Cc: <libvir-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:07:45PM +0200, arnaud champion devatom fr wrote:
?Okay, I'll make the change... Currently at naming level, my problem is
around Error class. Do you have a suggestion ?

What's wrong with following the example I gave, eg

 namespace Libvirt [

   public class Error {
   ...

>
>IMHO
>
>namespace LibvirtBindings
>{
>    public class virDomain
>    {
>    ....
>
>Is somewhat redundant and better named
>
>namespace Libvirt
>{
>    public class Domain
>    {
>    ....
>
>
>The 'vir' prefix on C library APIs/structs is just a hack because C
>does not have any concept of namespaces. It shouldn't be copied into
>languages which do have proper namespace support
>

Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]