[libvirt] RFC: virInterface change transaction API
Laine Stump
laine at laine.org
Tue Apr 19 19:35:10 UTC 2011
On 04/19/2011 10:59 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:53:05PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:03:03PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:31:05PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>>>> 1) libvirt
>>>>
>>>> At the libvirt layer, this feature just requires 3 new APIs, which
>>>> are directly passed through to netcf:
>>>>
>>>> virInterfaceChangeStart(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>>> virInterfaceChangeCommit(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>>> virInterfaceChangeRollback(virConnectPtr conn, unsigned int flags);
>>>>
>>>> For the initial implementation, these will be simple passthroughs
>>>> to similarly named netcf functions. (in the future, it would be
>>>> useful for the server side of libvirt to determine if client<->server
>>>> connectivity was lost due to the network changes, and automatically
>>>> tell netcf to do a rollback).
>>> When such a feature is added, we should make it dependent on FLAG_AUTO_ROLLBACK
>>> passed to ChangeStart. Higher levels on the management stack may want full
>>> controll over when rollback happens.
>> I don't think a AUTO_ROLLBACK flag is sufficient. You'd almost certainly
>> want to pass some info such as hostname/port number to test, and perhaps
>> a test timeout in milliseconds, and perhaps a retry count.
> Yes, that's why I wanted complete control over auto rollback, when it is
> inroduced.
What about the rollback that takes place at boot time if the changes
haven't been committed? Should that *always* happen, or should it be
controllable by flags as well. I had intended that at least that
automatic rollback would be present in the first implementation...
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list