[libvirt] Need a better word than "allocated" or "ascertained"

Justin Clift jclift at redhat.com
Thu Jan 6 17:13:29 UTC 2011


On 07/01/2011, at 3:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 09:46 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote:
>> On 01/06/11 17:36, Justin Clift wrote:
>>> Hi us,
>> [...]
>>> "Ascertained" doesn't really make sense to me in this context.  Wondering
>>> if anyone has better suggestions? :)
>> 
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> assured/guaranteed? Please please, not ascertained. In the name of all
>> not-native-English speaking people :)
> 
> Guaranteed sounds best to me.

Thanks guys, that sounds much better:

Minimum memory guaranteed for the guest domain during contention,
 in kilobytes. QEMU and LXC only.

Will update now. :)




More information about the libvir-list mailing list