[libvirt] Need a better word than "allocated" or "ascertained"
Justin Clift
jclift at redhat.com
Thu Jan 6 17:13:29 UTC 2011
On 07/01/2011, at 3:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 09:46 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote:
>> On 01/06/11 17:36, Justin Clift wrote:
>>> Hi us,
>> [...]
>>> "Ascertained" doesn't really make sense to me in this context. Wondering
>>> if anyone has better suggestions? :)
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> assured/guaranteed? Please please, not ascertained. In the name of all
>> not-native-English speaking people :)
>
> Guaranteed sounds best to me.
Thanks guys, that sounds much better:
Minimum memory guaranteed for the guest domain during contention,
in kilobytes. QEMU and LXC only.
Will update now. :)
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list