[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] Need a better word than "allocated" or "ascertained"



On 07/01/2011, at 6:12 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
<snip>
>> Guaranteed sounds best to me.
>> 
> Thats not Gauranteed to the best of my knowlegde
> 
> Balbir suggest "enforced", I guessed i dropped it somewhere.
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-August/msg00712.html

Balbir's suggested wording (from the email):

  "limit to enforce on memory contention"

Does that mean it's the minimum memory "limit" it would really like to
have, but can't guarantee it?  (ie it's not guaranteed)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]