[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] datatypes: Fix outdated function names in the documentation



On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:48:57PM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> ---
>  src/datatypes.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/datatypes.c b/src/datatypes.c
> index b43a571..5197863 100644
> --- a/src/datatypes.c
> +++ b/src/datatypes.c
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ virUnrefInterface(virInterfacePtr iface) {
>   * Lookup if the storage pool is already registered for that connection,
>   * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
>   * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
> - * virFreeStoragePool() is needed to not leak data.
> + * virUnrefStoragePool() is needed to not leak data.
>   *
>   * Returns a pointer to the network, or NULL in case of failure
>   */
> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ virUnrefStoragePool(virStoragePoolPtr pool) {
>   * Lookup if the storage vol is already registered for that connection,
>   * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
>   * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
> - * virFreeStorageVol() is needed to not leak data.
> + * virUnrefStorageVol() is needed to not leak data.
>   *
>   * Returns a pointer to the storage vol, or NULL in case of failure
>   */
> @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ virUnrefStorageVol(virStorageVolPtr vol) {
>   * Lookup if the device is already registered for that connection,
>   * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
>   * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
> - * virFreeNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data.
> + * virUnrefNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data.
>   *
>   * Returns a pointer to the node device, or NULL in case of failure
>   */
> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ virUnrefNodeDevice(virNodeDevicePtr dev) {
>   *
>   * Lookup if the secret is already registered for that connection, if so return
>   * a pointer to it, otherwise allocate a new structure, and register it in the
> - * table. In any case a corresponding call to virFreeSecret() is needed to not
> + * table. In any case a corresponding call to virUnrefSecret() is needed to not
>   * leak data.
>   *
>   * Returns a pointer to the secret, or NULL in case of failure

ACK

Daniel


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]