[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] virsh: Error prompt if one passes negative value for scheduler setting

于 2011年01月28日 23:33, Eric Blake 写道:
On 01/28/2011 05:11 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
于 2011年01月28日 20:02, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:53:44PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
As cgroup doesn't allow one writes negative into files like cpu.shares,
(e.g. echo -1>   /cgroup/cpu/libvirt/qemu/rhel6/cpu.shares), user will be
confused if libvirt accepts negative value and converts it into unsigned
int (or long int, etc) silently.

But strtoul() is explicitly documented as accepting -1 as shorthand for
ULONG_MAX, and as a command-line convenience, I much prefer that
shorthand over 18446744073709551615.  I don't see this as confusing.

Surely this check should be done inside  virStrToLong_{ui,ul,ull}

If we want to be sticklers about reject '-' and module 2^32 (2^64)
wraparound, then yes, virStrToLong_u* would be the place to do it.  But
I'm not convinced that this is a good change.

I'm afraid changing on virStrToLong_u* will affect other codes, pretty
codes use them.

Is there some codes that expects virStrToLong_{ui,ul,ull} to convert
the negative to {ui, ul, ull}?

Probably, given the above arguments about -1 being useful shorthand for
the maximum value.

Yeah, so are you agreed with danpb? making changes on docs?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]