[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)



On 03/10/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
On 03/10/2011 01:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:03:57PM +0100, Radek Hladik wrote:
Hi all,
Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait for
Lyre's and Radek's reply then.
[snip]

I don't know what should we do but I guess having the dual-licensing
could be the best thing. We can't have the project name php-libvirt
because of the PHP license :(
So we avoid the PHP license for our code then. Here's what we do

  - Our code is licensed LGPLv2+
  - Project is named/described  'libvirt bindings for PHP'
  - RPM / tar.gz is named  php-libvirt  (this is in fact required by Fedora
    RPM guidelines for php extensions)

Regards,
Daniel
OK, done. I've already commented this bugzilla and we'll see...

Thanks,
Michal

--
Michal Novotny<minovotn redhat com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]