[libvirt] Upgrade-problems from qemu-0.14.1 + libvirt-0.8.4 to qemu-0.15.1 + libvirt-0.9.6: Why I think multifunction=on is a bad idea...
Philipp Hahn
hahn at univention.de
Mon Nov 28 07:34:21 UTC 2011
Hello,
On Thursday 17 November 2011 18:39:15 Eric Blake wrote:
> Is any of this worth keeping on the public libvir-list?
Not much but to be careful when you upgrade any part of libvirt, qemu(-kvm) or
it's (external*) dependencies like etherboot/iPXE, vgabios and seabios,
because it can invalidate your snapshots and saved state.
(*): As Debian does for DFSG-compliance, since it replaces the seabios /
vgabios / pxe-bios as shipped with qemu by a version compiled from
(different) sources.
Sincerely
Philipp
--
Philipp Hahn Open Source Software Engineer hahn at univention.de
Univention GmbH Linux for Your Business fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
Mary-Somerville-Str.1 D-28359 Bremen fax: +49 421 22 232-99
http://www.univention.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20111128/e175f40f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list