[libvirt] [test-API 2/3] Add the better copyright statements in scripts

[Osier Yang]

On 2012年04月17日 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>> On 2012年04月17日 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>> The new copyright statements is:
>>>>
>>>> <copyright>
>>>>   Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>
>>>>   libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>>>   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>>>   published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the
>>>>   License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>
>>>>   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>>   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranties of
>>>>   TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>>>>   PURPOSE.
>>>>
>>>>   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>>>   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>>   Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
>>>> </copyright>
>>>
>>> I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere in libvirt
>>> code uses
>>>
>>>   * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>>   * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>   * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307  USA
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
>> update the address in libvirt codes too?
>
> Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
> completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
> about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
> multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
>
>   *  You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
>   *  along with this program.  If not, see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>

I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's better
, per they moves from time to time, ;-)

Osier