[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] ANNOUNCE: Stable release libvirt-

>> Okay, I screwed up the tarball for the first stable release, due to not
>> building it from a fresh checkout :/ No changes for this one except a
>> version
>> bump and dist rebuild.
>> This release can be downloaded at:
>> http://libvirt.org/sources/libvirt-
>> Thanks,
>> Cole
>> --
>> libvir-list mailing list
>> libvir-list redhat com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming
> convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update
> from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't
> know how anyone would think that is not a standard update from
> 0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the distributed
> file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on
> libvirt.org).
> Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name
> libvirt-stable- ?
> To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion.
> Thanks,
> Jason

Additionally, it may be beneficial to have a different download path, as
well for the stable releases. For example:

For standard releases:

For stable releases:

And then document this on the the website, if it hasn't already been.

Thanks, again.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]