[libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] qapi: Introduce add-fd, remove-fd, query-fdsets

[Luiz Capitulino]

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:18:33 -0400
Corey Bryant <coreyb at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/08/2012 05:13 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:52:41 -0400
> > Corey Bryant <coreyb at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/08/2012 04:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:07:02 -0400
> >>> Corey Bryant <coreyb at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 08/07/2012 06:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>>>> On 08/07/2012 11:07 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +#
> >>>>>>>> +# Since: 1.2.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We're not very consistent on '1.2' vs. '1.2.0' in since listings, but
> >>>>>>> that's probably worth a global cleanup closer to hard freeze.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll make a note of it.  Or does Luiz usually do a cleanup?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No idea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Luiz, were you planning to take a pass at cleaning up the "since"
> >>>> release?  If not let me know and I can submit a patch.  Just let me know
> >>>> which to use, '1.2' or '1.2.0'.
> >>>
> >>> I'd appreciate it if you submit a patch. I guess we should use 1.2.0.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sure I'll do that.
> >>
> >> Btw, should I be using error_set(errp, ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, "...")
> >> and have a dependency on your patch series?  Or should I stick with the
> >> old error messages?
> >
> > That would preferable, yes. Specially if you're adding new errors.
> >
> > But I'm not exactly sure when my series will be merged, this depends on
> > what review will bring.
> >
> 
> Are you planning on getting in QEMU 1.2?

Absolutely.