[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] UPDATE: Re: [PATCH] specfile: require libnl3 for Fedora >= 18 and RHEL >= 7



On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:57:28PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 06:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 08/24/2012 03:57 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> >> Everything is ready in both netcf and libvirt to switch over to libnl3
> >> in future releases of both Fedora and RHEL. This needs to be done more
> >> or less simultaneously in both packages, though, because you can't mix
> >> libnl1.1 and libnl3 in the same process (e.g. libvirtd using
> >> libnl-3.so and libnetcf.so, while libnetcf.so uses libnl.so)
> >>
> >> This patch does two things when fedora >= 18 || rhel >= 7):
> >>
> >>   1) requires libnl3-devel
> >>   2) requires netcf-devel-0.2.2 or greater
> >>
> >> (the idea is that a similar patch is going into netcf's specfile, so
> >> that when a build of netcf is done on F18 or later (or RHEL7 or later)
> >> netcf will be guaranteed to be built with libnl3 rather than
> >> libnl-1.1)
> >> ---
> >>  libvirt.spec.in | 9 +++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > Makes sense - you have my ACK from a review standpoint, although I'd at
> > least like to test a build against the netcf package from F18
> > updates-testing if we have time to do that before DV cuts the 0.10.0
> > release.
> 
> Okay, I've cut the netcf-0.2.2 release, done builds for F18 and rawhide,
> submitted the F18 update, and added a build-override to force use of
> netcf-0.2.2.fc18.
> 
> On the libvirt side, I tried a scratch build on f18 and found a problem
> with CFLAGS that only occurs when building on a system that has
> libnl3-devel only (no libnl-devel). I pushed a patch for that (because
> it's a one line build breaker) and scratch builds with the updated
> libvirt.spec now build properly with netcf-0.2.2 and libnl3-devel.
> 
> So everything should be okay to push the original patch in this thread.
> As we've discussed, it will be much simpler to deal with if we can do
> that before 0.10.0 is released, but I won't be around during the week to
> make sure it happens (unless someone ACKs in the next 5 hours or so :-)
> 
> So - if/when you ACK the patch, please also push it.
> 
> Thanks!

  ACK, too, I'm pushing this for rc2,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]