[libvirt] [PATCHv2 3/7] network: backend functions for updating network dns host/srv/txt

[Eric Blake]

On 12/10/2012 02:23 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> These three functions are very similar - none allow a MODIFY
> operation; you can only add or delete.
> 
> The biggest difference between them (other than the data itself) is in
> the criteria for determining a match, and whether or not multiple
> matches are possible:
> 
> 1) for HOST records, it's considered a match if the IP address or any
> of the hostnames of an existing record matches.
> 
> 2) for SRV records, it's a match if all of
> domain+service+protocol+target *which have been specified* are
> matched.
> 
> 3) for TXT records, there is only a single field to match - name
> (value can be the same for multiple records, and isn't considered a
> search term), so by definition there can be no ambiguous matches.
> 
> In all three cases, if any matches are found, ADD will fail; if
> multiple matches are found, it means the search term was ambiguous,
> and a DELETE will fail.
> 
> The upper level code in bridge_driver.c is already implemented for
> these functions - appropriate conf files will be re-written, and
> dnsmasq will be SIGHUPed or restarted as appropriate.
> ---
>  src/conf/network_conf.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 232 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

I can't say I understand all the networking nuances allowed by adding
and removing aspects; but coding-wise this looks sane, and I'm
comfortable giving:

ACK.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20121210/647f3a90/attachment-0001.sig>