[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/14 v4] Implement virtlockd daemon



On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:46:56AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:41:34PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> While we're past the freeze date, I'd like to request an
> >> exception, for all except the 14th patch. Without the
> >> 14th patch, this series has minimal impact on existing code
> >> that is used in libvirt so little regression possibility.
> >> Further I discovered yesterday that we already have people
> >> using this code as custom add-on patches, so I'd like to
> >> help them by including it in 1.0.1
> > 
> > No one has any opinions on this ?
> 
> I think the series has been posted long enough, and even mostly had acks
> prior to the freeze, so it's not like a late-breaking code addition,
> rather that it has just taken us a while to get it stable.  I can agree
> with getting it in the tree now, before rc2, as it does improve
> reliability of libvirt out-of-the-box on a single machine.

Ok, based on your & Michael's ACKs, I'm pushing this (minus the change
to make it default). I also validated it didn't break Win32 builds.

Hopefully the same is true of BSD/OS-X, but appreciate some testing
of that...

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]