[libvirt] [PATCH 6/8 v8] qemu: Check if the shared disk's cdbfilter conflicts with others
Osier Yang
jyang at redhat.com
Sun Dec 16 19:08:03 UTC 2012
On 2012年12月15日 05:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 08:44 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>> This prevents the domain starting if the shared disk's setting
>> conflicts with other active domain(s), E.g. A domain with
>> "cdbfilter" set as "yes", however, another active domain is using
>> it set as "no".
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/qemu/qemu_process.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> index bcea0ff..1e2baac 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> @@ -3385,6 +3385,54 @@ qemuProcessReconnectAll(virConnectPtr conn, virQEMUDriverPtr driver)
>> virHashForEach(driver->domains.objs, qemuProcessReconnectHelper,&data);
>> }
>>
>> +/* Check if a shared disk's setting conflicts with the conf
>> + * used by other domain(s). Currently only checks the cdbfilter
>> + * setting.
>
> Probably worth documenting that this function should only be called on
> disks with a block device source...
>
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 if no conflicts, otherwise returns -1.
>> + */
>> +int
>> +qemuCheckSharedDisk(virHashTablePtr sharedDisks,
>> + virDomainDiskDefPtr disk)
>> +{
>> + int val;
>> + size_t *ref = NULL;
>> + char *key = NULL;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!(key = qemuGetSharedDiskKey(disk->src)))
>> + return -1;
>
> since you error out on regular files. (You correctly obey that
> restriction for now, but without documentation, it might be possible to
> reuse this function from the wrong context in a future patch.)
Okay.
>
>> +
>> + /* It can't be conflict if no other domain is
>> + * is sharing it.
>> + */
>> + if (!(ref = virHashLookup(sharedDisks, key)))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> + if (ref == (void *)0x1)
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> + if (virGetDeviceUnprivSGIO(disk->src, NULL,&val)< 0) {
>> + ret = -1;
>> + goto cleanup;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((val == 0&&
>> + disk->cdbfilter == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_YES) ||
>
> Does this do the right thing if disk->cdbfilter ==
> VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_DEFAULT (that is, the user didn't specify the
> cdbfilter attribute)?
Oh, right, there is problem here. It should be like:
if (!disk->cdbfilter)
return 0
in the early beginnng of the function.
As VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_DEFAULT implies it doesn't care
about the SG_IO setting. I.E, It lives with what current setting
is.
> Again, this area of code may need tweaks if you
> take my suggestion of making rawio a three-value enum.
>
>> + (val == 1&&
>> + disk->cdbfilter == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>> + _("cdbfilter of shared disk '%s' conflicts with other "
>> + "active domains"), disk->src);
>
> INTERNAL_ERROR is wrong. I think VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID fits better.
Okay, the error number is always fuzzy to use. :-)
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list