[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [RFC Incomplete Patch] Libvirt + Openvswitch



On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange redhat com> wrote:
>> > I do like the idea of using the virtual port construct even in the
>> > initial <interface> only case.  For example:
>> >
>> > <interface type='bridge'>
>> >  <bridge name='br0'>
>> >  <virtualport type="openvswitch">
>> >    <parameters interfaceid='xyzzy'/>
>> >  </virtualport>
>> > </interface>

>
> NB,  type='bridge' technically refers to the *concept* of bridging
> an interface to a LAN, not the implemntation of Linux software
> bridging. Thus it shouldn't change for OpenVSwitch which is also
> providing bridging to the LAN here.

That makes sense.  We'll stick with the example above.

Dan


>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]