[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-glib] Add gvir_domain_get_saved()



On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> (We already discussed at length why this
>> is needed and we are already doing it for other boolean getters so
>> lets not have the discussion about this need, again).
>
> Actually this was discussed for libosinfo, not libvirt-glib, here is the
> relevant email for those who were wondering about this discussion:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2011-November/msg00090.html

Ah ok but both libraries are meant to be first-class g* citizens and
hence the same need to follow the usual conventions unless there is a
compelling reason not to. Also what I said about us already following
this convention is not incorrect either, e.g
gvir_domain_get_persistent() declared/defined just above this new
function.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]