[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add basic driver for Parallels Virtuozzo Server



On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:42:11PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 10:54 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:52:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:49:03PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:57:55PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
> >>>>Parallels Cloud Server is a virtualization solution
> >>>>that allows users to simultaneously run multiple virtual
> >>>>machines and containers on the same physical server.
> >>>>
> >>>>More information can be found here: http://www.parallels.com/products/pcs/
> >>>>Also beta version of Parallels Cloud Server can be downloaded there.
> >>>   Okay, basically the main obstable on the last review which was the
> >>>unavailability of the hypervisor is now fixed :-)
> >>>
> >>>>Dmitry Guryanov (8):
> >>>>   parallels: add driver skeleton
> >>>>   parallels: add functions to list domains and get info
> >>>>   parallels: implement functions for domain life cycle management
> >>>>   parallels: get info about serial ports
> >>>>   parallels: add support of VNC remote display
> >>>>   parallels: implement virDomainDefineXML operation for existing
> >>>>     domains
> >>>>   parallels: add storage driver
> >>>>   parallels: implement VM creation
> >>>   I woud not rush it to push it before the freeze, it's a big new
> >>>functionality and i would rather have a bit of time before a release
> >>>with it. But starting next week we should be good to go commiting
> >>>the parts of the drivers which would get ACK'ed in the meantime.
> >>I'd suggest when we merge the Parallels driver, we can change our
> >>version number to be  0.10.0, since we've been on 0.9.x for a long
> >>time now, and new hypervisor drivers have been our motivation for
> >>version number changes in the past :-)
> >   Okay, this should affect patches 2,3,6 and 7 where 0.9.12 will have to
> >be replaced by 0.10.0, but that can be done easilly when this gets
> >applied to the tree next week,
> >
> >Daniel
> Hello,
> 
> There is a conflict with first patch - file mingw32-libvirt.spec.in
> removed from tree, I'll resend patches.

It was actually just renamed to mingw-libvirt.spec.in - and re-arranged
to build for 32 & 64 bit Windows binaries. You ought to be able to adapt
your change to apply to the new file without much trouble.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]