[libvirt] [PATCH] selinux: Do not automatically label images of unconfined domains

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Wed Jul 25 09:56:37 UTC 2012


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:41:27AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> When an unconfined domain is begin started, it doesn't make any sense to
> automatically relabel its disk images with the default label. Morever,
> doing so would fail because the generated label would be generated
> without the "s0" sensitivity (since mcs is NULL in this case).
> ---
>  src/security/security_selinux.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> index ca19b70..02808a4 100644
> --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
> +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> @@ -370,8 +370,13 @@ virSecuritySELinuxGenSecurityLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
>          goto cleanup;
>      }
>  
> -    if (!def->seclabel.norelabel) {
> -        def->seclabel.imagelabel = virSecuritySELinuxGenNewContext(data->file_context, mcs);
> +    /* Generating image label does not make any sense if the domain itself
> +     * will not be labeled.
> +     */
> +    if (def->seclabel.type != VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE &&
> +        !def->seclabel.norelabel) {
> +        def->seclabel.imagelabel =
> +            virSecuritySELinuxGenNewContext(data->file_context, mcs);
>          if (!def->seclabel.imagelabel)  {
>              virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>                             _("cannot generate selinux context for %s"), mcs);

ACK, assuming all places in the file already handle the case of a
imagelabel==NULL.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list