[libvirt] [PATCH 1/7] qemu: Fix misleading comment for qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver()

[Peter Krempa]

On 10/11/12 05:25, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> The comment stated that you may call qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver()
>> without passing qemud_driver to signalize it's not locked.
>
> signalize is a valid spelling, but unusual; I'd write it 'signal'.
>
>> qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver still accesses the qemud_driver
>> structure and the lock singalling is done through a separate parameter.
>
> s/singalling/signaling/
>
>> ---
>>   src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> ACK.  This one can be applied independently of my pending patches
> (aargh, I still need to get those rebased with comments addressed...).

I fixed the spelling and pushed.

Peter