[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] RFC: APIs to manage KSM

On 2012年08月31日 23:00, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/31/2012 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

some more generic name. eg


likewise for all the enum/constant names.

For that matter, why can't we reuse the existing
virDomainSetMemoryParameters() for the enum/constants?  That is, whether
or not to use ksm is a memory parameter.

Actually this is a host level action. There is a separate non-upstreamed
patch which lets us control whether KSM is used per-guest, which is waiting
for a fix to QEMU

Oh, I missed virNode vs. virDomain.  Still, consistent naming argues for
virNodeSetMemoryParameters (not MemorySharingParameters), so that we can
add future MemoryParameters unrelated to sharing.

I'm afraid there could be too much parameter fields in future if
using MemoryParameters. That is, do we want to have one "big" API,
or smaller ones?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]