[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] security: also parse user/group names instead of just IDs for DAC labels



On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:43:35AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 07:31 AM, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
> >>> possible ambiguities (since it is legal [although stupid] to have a user
> >>> name consisting of all digits and worse having the name differ from the
> >>> underlying uid),
> 
> >> The other option (that I prefer more) would be to document this
> >> behavior and leave it as proposed in this patch. Or maybe just
> >> reverse the order of resolving so that the numerical parsing is done
> >> before name parsing.
> >>
> >> If we warn the user, that specifying numerical values will result
> >> into using them as UID and GID and strings being translated we
> >> filter out the ambiguity by our design.
> >>
> >> I don't think it's worth spending this effort on such a weird corner case.
> > 
> > I agree with Peter here. These ambiguities will be very rare and a
> > well-documented behavior should be enough for this scenario. However
> > reversing the order still can lead to ambiguities, because it's never
> > possible to be sure if a sequence of digits is a username or not. But
> > again, we just need to make this point clear in docs.
> 
> The coreutils' solution in chown is that a name parse is attempted
> before numeric parse, and that a leading '+' (which is not valid in
> names) is the way to force a numeric parse.  If anything, we should copy
> that approach for consistency.

I really like this approach.

> 
> >>> except that what happens if I want to mix number and name between uid
> >>> and gid?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Mixing them will work in my approach presented here.
> 
> You still didn't answer my bigger question - when migrating, do we care
> about the case where the same user name has different uid on the two
> machines, and if so, do we make it possible for the user to choose
> between migrating with constant uid vs. migrating with constant name?
> If we always parse names into uids up front, then we are preventing the
> user from migration by name.

With the current implementation, if names are given then names will be
honored in a migration and if IDs are given then IDs will be honored.
So, if a user has different IDs in different hosts and the seclabel was
defined using names, the owner's uid will be replaced when this guest is
migrated.

> 
> -- 
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]