[libvirt] Release of libvirt-0.10.2

[Kashyap Chamarthy]

On 09/24/2012 10:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 02:20 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> On 09/24/2012 01:18 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>>   Since there was no negative feedback since rc2, I have rolled the
>>> release a bit earlier this morning, it is tagged in git and available
>>> as usual at:
>>>    ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
>>
>> Thanks. Just testing on Fedora-18. So far everything smooth.
>>
>> #--------------------------------#
>> [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q libvirt-daemon-kvm qemu-kvm ; uname -r
>> libvirt-daemon-kvm-0.10.2-1.fc18.x86_64
>> qemu-kvm-1.2.0-9.fc18.x86_64
>> 3.6.0-0.rc6.git0.2.fc18.x86_64
>> [root at localhost ~]# virsh list
>>  Id    Name                           State
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>  2     f17vm1                         running
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]#
>> #--------------------------------#
>>
>> Also testing blockcommit related work now.
> 
> The API made it in, but the implementation did not; for now, the
> blockcommit command will just fail. 


Ah, yeah. I was reading on upstream qemu list on Jeff's email thread on " [Qemu-devel]
[PATCH 0/8] Live block commit"


> I'm still working on the API for
> 0.10.3 for offline domains, and waiting for qemu 1.3 to provide hooks
> for online domains; however, since the API is in place, it is feasible
> to backport the implementations without breaking .so versioning, so it
> is still possible that RHEL releases may choose to backport whatever I
> get working even while sticking to 0.10.2 .so naming.

I'm wondering to compile latest from qemu-git? (I don't know which tree has all the bits
though, there's Paolo's treewith block-mirror stuff?), there's Jeff Cody's tree.

Just to note, I'm testing everything on Fedora-18.


> 


-- 
/kashyap