[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/4] Remaining patches from VFIO series



On 04/25/2013 09:44 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> I've pushed everything else from all 3 VFIO series.
>
> Patch 1/4 in this series had questions from Eric about whether it is
> the right way to go, or if we want to do something more limited:
>
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01864.html
>
> Eric and danpb had both raised issues with Patch 2/4, so I redid it
> addressing all the points they brought up, and it's now ready for
> review:
>
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01853.html
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01869.html
>
> 3/4 and 4/4 were ACKed, but depend on 2/4, so I couldn't push them.

I mixed up the ordering of these in the descriptions above - the cgroup
ACL patch was 3/4, *not* 1/4.

I just pushed the vir(Process|Command)SetMax(.*) patches, but not the
cgroup patch.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]