[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] pvpanic plans?



On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek redhat com> wrote:
> On 08/22/13 22:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> The difference is that ACPI or platform devices in general are
>> unexpected to be added.  By definition it means that the motherboard has
>> most likely been changed.
>
> You could encounter a new ACPI artifact after simply re-flashing your MB
> with an updated BIOS, without opening the chassis. "If windows can't
> deal with that, their loss!" :)

I'm pretty sure "does Windows boot up okay" is on every major vendor's
firmware test plan for shipping new updates...

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Laszlo
> /hides


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]