[libvirt] [PATCH 1/4] locking: Remove unnecessary setting of lockspace

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 18:38:16 UTC 2013


In virLockSpaceProtocolDispatchNew() the returned value of lockspace from
virLockDaemonFindLockSpace() is overwritten by the virLockSpaceNew() return.
Coverity complains that it's unused.

In virLockSpaceProtocolDispatchCreateLockSpace() lockspace is also overwritten
in a similar manner resulting in the same Coverity message.
---
 src/locking/lock_daemon_dispatch.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/locking/lock_daemon_dispatch.c b/src/locking/lock_daemon_dispatch.c
index 45d2cae..4c99088 100644
--- a/src/locking/lock_daemon_dispatch.c
+++ b/src/locking/lock_daemon_dispatch.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ virLockSpaceProtocolDispatchNew(virNetServerPtr server ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
         goto cleanup;
     }
 
-    if ((lockspace = virLockDaemonFindLockSpace(lockDaemon, args->path))) {
+    if (virLockDaemonFindLockSpace(lockDaemon, args->path) != NULL) {
         virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
                        _("Lockspace for path %s already exists"),
                        args->path);
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ virLockSpaceProtocolDispatchCreateLockSpace(virNetServerPtr server ATTRIBUTE_UNU
         goto cleanup;
     }
 
-    if ((lockspace = virLockDaemonFindLockSpace(lockDaemon, args->path))) {
+    if (virLockDaemonFindLockSpace(lockDaemon, args->path) != NULL) {
         virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
                        _("Lockspace for path %s already exists"),
                        args->path);
-- 
1.7.11.7




More information about the libvir-list mailing list