[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt][Sheepdog]Sheepdog pool/volume storage driver for libvirt problem



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Eric Blake <eblake redhat com> wrote:
[...]
> There's two aspects to storage management in libvirt.

Eric, very thanks for your perfectly answers ;-)

[...]
>But without at least one online user (qemu), it
> doesn't make sense to worry about offline management in libvirt (what
> good is allocating a volume if you can't make any guest populate or read
> from that volume).  That's why we are telling you to focus on getting
> your new protocol accepted into qemu first.
>
Actually, i also cannot quite understand why we focus on getting new
protocol accepted into qemu first. Could you please expain it clearer?
Thanks in advance ;-)

-- 
Thanks
Harry Wei


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]