[libvirt] [PATCH v2 2/7] storage: Support "username" for "chap" type "auth"

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Thu Jul 11 14:11:16 UTC 2013


On 07/10/2013 12:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:51:42AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> On 07/10/2013 10:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:10:46PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
...<snip>
>>
>> To be sure we're on the same page, the storage_conf XML then becomes
>>
>> <auth username='someuser'>
>>   <secret type='[ceph|iscsi]' [usage='mypassed'|uuid='someuuid']/>
>> </auth>
> 
> Actually I think the schema is:
> 
>  <auth username='someuser' type='[ceph|chap]'>
>    <secret [usage='mypassed'|uuid='someuuid']/>
>  </auth>
> 
>> That is there'd be no reason for 'type' in the XML nor 'password'.  The
>> 'login' goes away and the 'username' becomes required.
> 
> I think you still want to keep 'type' in the XML, since if iSCSI adds
> a different auth mechanism that isn't 'chap', then we have the ability
> to represent that using a new type.
> 

The <secret> XML has an existing 'type' which is 'ceph', 'iscsi' (eg,
CHAP), or 'volume' and I just figured that since the <auth> XML requires
'username' and the <secret> subelement with a mandatory 'type'
attribute, then that would cover the needs.

See:  http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsDisks

I'm not objecting to using the 'type' in the <auth> XML, just noting
that's it's a duplication of an attribute, although I suppose if some
authentication mechanism was added in the future that didn't use the
secret element, then having a type present make things easier.

John





More information about the libvir-list mailing list