[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] qemu: only check for PIIX3-specific device addrs on pc-* machinetypes



On 07/23/2013 11:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I'm thinking that it would probably be better to move all the re-indented
> code out into a qemuValidateDevicePCISlotsPIIX3() and just call that
> function from qemuAssignDevicePCISlots(). That way if we need to add
> more validation for other machine types in the future, we have a good
> modular code structure. This would probably make the diff more sane
> too, since you wouldn't be indenting code.

Ah yes, good idea! I'll do that and resend.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:44:52AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:

> (Note that, according to the qemuxml2argv-pseries-usb-multi test, ppc
> "pseries" machines also have a PIIX3 chip (since that test file adds a
> "piix3-uhci" usb controller). I don't know if this is really the case
> or not, but had to include that machine type in the checks in order
> for make check to succeed with no changes to the test data.)

Anyone have better information about this? Does the pseries really have
a PIIX3? Or was that just an arbitrary entry added for a test case?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]