[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] IPv6 migration



On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 19:40:52 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> We can only tell QEMU on the destination to listen either on IPv6 or on
> IPv4.
> 
> If we're supplied with a numeric v6 address, that's the only thing we
> need to know to set the listen address to [::].
> 
> For hostnames, we can either assume this based on how it resolves by
> default on the destination (we keep trying all the resolved addresses on
> the source, but this might break a few cases), which John found
> disgusting, so that leaves user input:
> 
> How about a VIR_DOMAIN_MIGRATE_IPV6 flag, depending on which we set the
> listen address on the destination and creating a new function
> virNetSocketNewConnectTCPHints, where we would add IPv4/IPv6 hint
> based on the presence/absence of this flag?

Yeah, I think using an explicit flag would be the best approach. As we
learnt several times, implementing automagic behavior is too fragile and
leads to ugly code and confusion. IIUC, we would tell QEMU to listen on
:: iff either migrateuri uses IPv6 address explicitly or
VIR_DOMAIN_MIGRATE_IPV6 flag is set. In all other cases, 0.0.0.0 address
will be passed to QEMU. In other words, unless a user takes an explicit
action, migration will use IPv4 regardless on libvirt version.

> Would it be better to auto-add this flag for numeric addresses, or just
> check for them both in the Prepare phase on the dest (and set
> listen_addr accordingly) and before connecting from the source, so we
> don't use the IPv4 hint (in case we wanted to use the partial fix for
> just numeric addresses for older libvirt).

I don't think auto-adding the flag is wise.

Jirka


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]