[libvirt] pvpanic plans?

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:32:43AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 08:30 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:39:03AM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I know it's been a long time since this thread. But qemu 1.7 is
> >> releasing, do you have any consensus on this?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > I think the biggest issue is the new PANICKED state.
> > Guests already have simple ways to halt the CPU,
> > and actually do.  I think a new state was a mistake.
> > So how about the following? Does it break anything?
> > (Untested).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/misc/pvpanic.c b/hw/misc/pvpanic.c
> > index 226e298..2055afc 100644
> > --- a/hw/misc/pvpanic.c
> > +++ b/hw/misc/pvpanic.c
> > @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ static void handle_event(int event)
> >  
> >      if (event & PVPANIC_PANICKED) {
> >          panicked_mon_event("pause");
> > -        vm_stop(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED);
> 
> Don't you still need to halt the guest on a panic event, for management
> to have a chance to choose what to do about the panic?

Guest can just call hlt to do this. Most guests do this on a panic
already.

> I'm suspecting
> this patch does break things.

http://xkcd.com/1172/

> -- 
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>