[libvirt] [PATCHv7 2/2] domain: conf: Fix secret type checking for network volumes

Ján Tomko jtomko at redhat.com
Thu Jan 30 14:46:25 UTC 2014


On 01/23/2014 08:45 PM, Adam Walters wrote:
> This patch fixes the secret type checking done in the
> virDomainDiskDefParseXML function. Previously, it would not allow any
> volumes that utilized a secret. This patch is a simple bypass of the
> checking code for volumes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Walters <adam at pandorasboxen.com>
> ---
>  src/conf/domain_conf.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 28e24f9..773dc26 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -5418,7 +5418,8 @@ virDomainDiskDefParseXML(virDomainXMLOptionPtr xmlopt,
>          cur = cur->next;
>      }
>  
> -    if (auth_secret_usage != -1 && auth_secret_usage != expected_secret_usage) {
> +    if (auth_secret_usage != -1 && auth_secret_usage != expected_secret_usage &&
> +        def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_VOLUME) {
>          virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>                         _("invalid secret type '%s'"),
>                         virSecretUsageTypeTypeToString(auth_secret_usage));

So an rbd volume can have a secret when the pool has auth set to none?
Otherwise it seems the volume's secret data might get overwritten by
qemuTranslateDiskSourcePoolAuth.

And this could also be added to qemuxml2argvtest.

> @@ -18214,7 +18215,8 @@ virDomainDiskDefForeachPath(virDomainDiskDefPtr disk,
>      if (!disk->src || disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_NETWORK ||
>          (disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_VOLUME &&
>           disk->srcpool &&
> -         disk->srcpool->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_SOURCE_POOL_MODE_DIRECT))
> +         (disk->srcpool->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_SOURCE_POOL_MODE_DIRECT ||
> +          disk->srcpool->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_NETWORK)))

What is the purpose of this? You are comparing the source pool mode against a
disk type constant. It seems this can never be true in this case.

Jan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20140130/c95d755e/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list