[libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] conf: Introduce viremulator_capabilities

[Michal Privoznik]

On 24.06.2014 21:34, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 03:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>>>
>>> We also have a <features> subelement of <guest> in the <capabilities>
>>> XML which is used for a similar thing although it doesn't support a
>>> per-machine-type output, only per-binary capabilities. Should we add
>>> this more granular approach and abandon the old one?
>>
>> Yes, we should stop adding stuff related to the guest to the main
>> <capabilities> XML since it doesn't scale.
>
> Oh phooey - I just proposed yet another feature there:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-June/msg01097.html
>
> I'd like to turn on a witness for active commit support in the same
> release as we turn on the qemu implementation (and I'm hoping it still
> makes libvirt 1.2.6 - we haven't frozen yet, but it's near the end of
> the month, and we're still waiting on some patches to make it into
> qemu.git).  If <features> is not the right place, then where should I
> advertise it?
>

I'm working on another version, but I'm not sure if I'll prepare patches 
prior to freeze. How critical is the active commit? I mean, can it wait 
a while (with possibility of slipping upcoming release)?

Michal