[libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] docs, conf, schema: add support for shared memory mapping

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon Sep 15 09:20:01 UTC 2014


On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:46:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >>On 09/08/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan at redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  docs/formatdomain.html.in                          |  7 +++-
> >>>  docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng                      |  5 +++
> >>>  src/conf/cpu_conf.c                                | 25 +++++++++++-
> >>>  src/conf/cpu_conf.h                                |  7 ++--
> >>>  .../qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml            | 28 ++++++++++++++
> >>>  .../qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml              | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c                            |  2 +
> >>>  7 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml
> >>>  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> index 94236dd..b284d6e 100644
> >>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
> >>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@
> >>>      ...
> >>>      <numa>
> >>>        <cell id='0' cpus='0-3' memory='512000'/>
> >>> -      <cell id='1' cpus='4-7' memory='512000'/>
> >>> +      <cell id='1' cpus='4-7' memory='512000' memShared='on'/>
> >>
> >>I wonder if "shared='on'" would be enough, avoiding the need for a multi-word
> >>attribute.
> >
> >Or how about   access="shared|private"   ?
> >
> 
> I prepended the "mem" so that it is visible that it has something to
> do with the memory, not the whole node.  But I'm OK with pushing
> shared= as well.  Using access= seems too ambiguously worded to me,
> although if most of you agree...

Sure, memAccess is fine with me. 


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list