[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] conf: fix forget restore ctxt->node when parse memory device success

On 05/21/2015 06:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:52:01PM +0800, lhuang wrote:
On 05/21/2015 03:46 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 13:08:12 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote:

When set a memory device in the xml, <sysinfo> in xml will be lost.
Because we forgot restore ctxt->node to the oldnode after parse memory
device, this will make the parse function after virDomainMemoryDefParseXML
cannot find a node they need when parse a full xml(virDomainDefParseXML).
The commit message is really hard to read.
Okay, I will pay more attention about this. Maybe use the exist similar
commit message as an example will be a good choice.

Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang redhat com>
  src/conf/domain_conf.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index bfdc94e..7ddc1ea 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -11828,6 +11828,7 @@ virDomainMemoryDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr memdevNode,
      if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(memdevNode, NULL, &def->info, flags) < 0)
          goto error;
+    ctxt->node = save;
      return def;
A test case is missing. The bugzilla link contains one so I'll add it.
Oh, I see, I hesitated about if need introduce a unit test when i fix this
Seems this is a rule about which case need a new test, isn't it? :)
Our rule is that any addition to the XML parser needs to have a test case
added  - especially true if the addition is fixing a parsing bug :-)

Oh, get it, i will record it to some place as i have a bad memory :) , thank you Daniel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]